I was at a Minneapolis advisory committee meeting yesterday and we started talking about Nicollet Mall. Nicollet Mall is in the heart of downtown Minneapolis, a few blocks from my perch on the 19th Floor. It’s supposed to be our city’s version of a pedestrian mall but it’s really not designed as such. It does have wide sidewalks and most street traffic is prohibited, except for buses. That’s one problem right there. Nicollet Mall has a lot of restaurants with sidewalk cafes. One of the pleasures of living in Minneapolis during the spring and summer is sitting outside on the Mall with friends. Until a bus comes rumbling down the street, temporarily drowning out any conversation and adding a lovely diesel aftertaste to the food. And the sidewalk cafes don’t leave much room to navigate with a wheelchair. There have been times when I’ve completely stopped pedestrian traffic on a whole block because I’m trying to squeeze between a table and a light post. If I had the Mayor’s ear, I’d tell him to get rid of the street and make the whole Mall one big sidewalk. That’s what I really liked about Lincoln Mall in Miami. No vehicle traffic and plenty of room to walk. Minneapolis shouldn’t try to imitate Miami, but the Mall’s design doesn’t currently support its image as an urban thoroughfare for pedestrians.
Hope you all had a righteous 420. Yeah, you know what I’m talking ’bout. You don’t? Well, just do a Google search. Hell, they talked about it on Morning Edition today. How underground can it really be?
I had a really weird dream last night. I was at some kind of awards dinner with the rest of the Humphrey Fellows. It felt like the Golden Globes or something. We had apparently made a movie that was getting all kinds of awards, but I have no idea what the movie was about. But I’m pretty sure Julia Roberts was at my table. I guess you had to be there. The dream had this weird internal logic that most dreams have while you’re experiencing them. This was such a weird and quirky dream that I felt compelled to mention it. So there you go. Let the psychoanalysis begin.
According to the Post, Bush’s efforts to “competitively source” federal jobs may be jeopardizing some federal employees with disabilities. Thousands of federal jobs are being reviewed to determine whether a private contractor can perform the same duties at a lower cost. A lot of these jobs are in food service, administrative support, and the like. Federal employees with disabilities may need additional support or supervision, which may put them at a disadvantage with a private contractor when doing a pure cost analysis.
For a president who likes to tout his so-called New Freedom Initiative, which includes the integration of people with disabilities in the workplace, this news only serves to illustrate Bush’s hypocrisy. The federal government has long been a leader in the employment of people with disabilities. Every administration since Truman’s has recognized the important role the federal government plays in creating job opportunities for people with disabilities. The employment policies of the federal government eventually filtered into the private sector, creating even more jobs for people with disabilities. During the Schiavo circus, Bush made it a point to say that he was fighting for the rights of the disabled, or as he put it: “those who live at the mercy of others.” Apparently, his advocacy doesn’t extend to the day-to-day issues that really matter to people with disabilities, like jobs and health care.
To be fair, the agencies questioned in the article have said that employees will be retrained and given new assignments if necessary. However, it can take a worker with a disability a long time to build the system of supports that lead to success for that individual. Forcing a sudden job change is disruptive to both the worker and the employer. I realize that employees with disabilities can’t be shielded from every eventuality, but they deserve to be supported in their continuing quest for independence and integration.
Ann Coulter was down in Northfield yesterday, trading insults with the students at St. Olaf College. And she’s on the cover of this week’s Time. Why the media still pays attention to this woman is beyond me. She’s not particularly clever or insightful. She’s about as unfunny as some of those Borscht-Belt comedians from back in the day. But I guess she does sort of embody the Republican feminine mystique, if there is such a thing. She’s white. She’s blonde. She’s thin almost to the point of being anorexic. She’s Protestant. And she wears really short skirts. And she pretty much finds people who aren’t white and Protestant kinda icky. In some conservative circles, this constitutes being a hottie. Personally, she strikes me as someone who is desperately trying to hide how boring and unoriginal she
really is.
It’s like summer here in the Twin Cities! I wore shorts the other day! The brilliant whiteness of my legs almost blinded me, but damnit, I wore shorts! And other people are wearing shorts! Beautiful people! Life is beautiful! I’m so giddy I’m going to end this sentence with two exclamation points!!
I’m listening to the In Our Time podcast from the BBC. It’s very soothing. I think they’re talking about archeology, but I can’t quite focus on the conversation. There’s something about people with British accents speaking eruditely on obscure academic subjects that has a very calming effect on the nerves. Perfect for a Sunday afternoon. They should play this stuff in dentists’ offices instead of that lite-rock excrement.
George Will had a provoking op-ed piece in the Washington Post a couple days ago that touched upon the concepts of genetic perfection, disability, and freedom of choice. He pointed out that 80% of fetuses that test positive for the genetic markers for Down’s Syndrome are aborted in the US. This, of course, has some disability rights groups concerned that expectant parents are being pressured into choosing abortion rather than attempting to raise a child with a disability. I’ll admit this is a sticky topic for me. I’m not prepared to condemn parents who choose not to have a child with a disability. At the same, I do think the much of the medical establishment tends to portray life with a disability in an exceedingly negative light. That’s why I could probably go along with something like Senator Brownback’s proposed Prenatally Diagnosed Condition Awareness Act. The bill, as Will describes it, would “increase the provision of scientifically sound information and support services to patients who receive positive test diagnoses for Down syndrome, spina bifida and other conditions.” Assuming that “scientifically sound information” also means politically unbiased information, I don’t have a problem with giving parents a complete picture of their child’s disability. If this bill threw up roadblocks to abortion like a forced waiting period, I’d have more reservations. But I do think there’s a certain amount of inevitability to this sort of thing. You can’t provide genetic testing and not expect parents to make decisions based on the results of those tests. Twenty years from now, I’d be very surprised if children are still born with SMA, at least in the developed world. I’m not saying that’s good or bad. It’s simply history at work.
I find it amusing that the hottest political debate of the moment surrounds the filibuster, a concept which most Americans only vaguely remember from their ninth-grade civics class. I also find it amusing that the Republicans, and specially religious conservatives, have enthusiastically portrayed themselves as long-suffering victims of a liberal judiciary. Look at this poster for an upcoming rally that will feature Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist and other conservative Christian leaders:

This is a blatantly cynical attempt to turn a debate about an obscure Senate rule into a righteous battle between the faithful and the unbelievers. And if Frist wants to have any hope of being a presidential nominee in 2008, he has to play along with this circus. Never mind that most of the judges in the Schiavo case, and the majority of the Supreme Court justices, are Republican appointees. Facts can be inconvenient at times like this. This would all be so funny if it weren’t so terribly sad. But if the filibuster is abolished, the world won’t end. Someday, Republicans will be the minority party again and they will face the long-term consequences of their thirst for complete power.
The City of Minneapolis is going ahead with plans to solicit bids to install and maintain a citywide WiFi network. Not wanting to aggravate its inferiority complex, the City of St. Paul is developing its own plans for a wireless network. The Minneapolis won’t mirror other citywide public networks like the one planned for Philadelphia. This one will be privately owned. Residents will pay about twenty bucks for month for access speeds of 1-3mbps. I’ll probably stick with my faster wired connection, but this will be great for people who don’t want to pay for cable or DSL. I’d like to see the subscription fee closer to ten or fifteen bucks, but this is a good start. This also coincides nicely with a project I’m working on with other Humphrey Fellows on the “Creative Class.” Investments like this attract and retain professionals and entrepreneurs that are vital to a city’s future, or so says Dr. Florida. Despite my misgivings about the hype he imbues in his theory, I think he actually has a point about the payoffs of technology improvements.
Because I just know you’re curious, here are some of the latest additions to my iTunes playlist: “Beating Heart Baby” by Head Automatica; “Galang” by M.I.A.., “Don’t Stop” by Brazilian Girls; and “Anything” by Styrofoam. M.I.A. and the lead singer of Brazilian Girls are competing for the title of Mark’s Next Pop Culture Crush. I’ll let you know who wins.
I read on Adam Curry’s blog that he’s going to be in Minneapolis in the next few days. I’ll be curious to hear his impressions of my fair metropolis. Downtown Minneapolis doesn’t have the hustle and bustle of a Manhattan or a London, but we still have our big-city charms. If he is staying downtown, he should try to catch the newly remodeled Walker Art Center. So should I, for that matter. And he should drop by Hell’s Kitchen for breakfast, particularly one of their Bloody Marys made with beer. Actually, I could go for one of those right about now.
I realize the death of a Pope is a big deal, but does it really deserve the cover of a magazine for two consecutive weeks? I’m looking at you, Newsweek. And you’re not much better, Time. Over the last few months, you’ve been phoning it in with cover stories on Mary, Jesus, God and medicine, and probably a few others I’m not remembering. I understand you’re trying to boost circulation in the red states, but how about tossing in some real news once in a while? I’m not saying you have to do it every issue. But every once in a while you might want to remind people about more earthly concerns, like the aftermath of the tsunami (remember the tsunami?) or the progress being made by the newly elected Iraqi government. Just a suggestion.
