I’ve been impulsively downloading tracks from iTunes lately. I can’t help myself. If I hear something I like, I have to have it. Lately, I’ve been obsessing over Snow Patrol and Death Cab for Cutie and Modest Mouse. Death cab’s “Transatlanticism” is probably one of the best songs I’ve discovered in the last six months. It has this piano-guitar combo that really strokes my brain the right way. I always listen to music while I write and I quickly get bored with the stuff I have, so I’m constantly looking for new sounds. I keep telling myself that I should develop more of an appreciation for jazz and classical, but I always end up browsing the alternative and electronica sections. It’s not that I don’t like classical and jazz, but it’s not the first thing that comes to my mind. I do have some Billie Holliday, Ella Fitzgerald, and some assorted classical stuff, but it represents a small portion of my collection. Does that make me somehow culturally aware? I’ve always struggled with the concept of listening to a certain piece of music or reading a certain book because you’re supposed to. On the one hand, shouldn’t your artistic choices be determined by your own tastes and not the dictates of some so-called authority? On the other hand, does that approach mean that some people will never venture beyond a narrow range of genres? When I was a kid, I didn’t read much else besides science fiction, including some really crappy Star Trek novels. It wasn’t until later in high school and into college that I was introduced to a broader and more diverse literature. If I hadn’t received that education, I might still be reading crappy Star Trek novels.
What does the Pentagon do when confronted with the widespread use of a potentially incriminating technology? It bans it, of course. Under new military regulations, digital cameras, camcorders, and phonecams are now verboten in Iraq. Not surprising, given that new photographs of prisoner abuse are turning up on an almost daily basis, but I have serious doubts about whether this ban can be easily enforced. There must be thousands of digicams and phonecams bouncing around in the pockets and knapsacks of soldiers and civilians alike in every corner of that country. Does the military brass plan on finding and confiscating all of them? I’m willing to wager that we’ll still continue to see unauthorized images leak out of Iraq long after the ban is put in place.
Over on Wonkette’s blog, I’ve been following the saga of the Washingtonienne. For those of you not in the know, the Washingtonienne was a former Senate aide who started a blog; the main topic of said blog was her various sexual exploits with assorted and sundry government officials. The Washingtonienne lost her Senate job once her boss got wind of the blog’s existence. She’ll probably get a book deal or a gig on MTV because of the whole brouhaha. And why not? She doesn’t seem too embarrassed by her conduct and it’s hardly any different than a guy bragging about his conquests. Yet we still have this cultural meme from antebellum times that young women are supposed to be coquettish, or at least discrete. What a bunch of gender-biased crap. She’d probably still have her job if she was a man. I know that if we had been colleagues and by some (major) miracle we had an intimate moment, I’d expect her to write all about it.
That’s it. I’m starting a separate blog about the sexual adventures of a minor government functionary in Minnesota who happens to be disabled. It will recount in lurid detail his freaky-deaky encounters with people in positions of power and the secrets he acquires when others are at their most vulnerable.
Oh, who am I kidding. Nobody would ever believe that shit. Hell, I wouldn’t believe it if I read it.
Oh, awesome. William Shatner may be doing a guess stint on Enterprise next season. I expect –no, I DEMAND–an episode with a corncucopia of exaggerated facial expressions and overly dramatic delivery of dialogue. I want to see Kirk grab T’Pol by the shoulders and exclaim, “But! T’Pol! You! Must! Learn! To! Love!” Have I mentioned my collection of Shatner MP3s? His covers of “Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds” and “Mr. Tambourine Man” are works of twisted genius. I should post them here so you can all bask in the greatness of The Kirk.
As is being reported in dozens of other blogs, Michael Moore has won the Palme d’Or at this year’s Cannes Film Festival for his film “Fahrenheit 9/11.” The right-wingers have probably already begun making jokes about Moore winning an award, never mind that the lead jury member is an American. Lots of people will heap disdain on Moore for even being able to say “thank you” in French. I can’t wait to see the film and I hope to find some people to go with me. It’s one of those things that is more fun to see with a bunch of people and then dissect over beer with people afterwards. As a filmmaker, I think Michael Moore is perceptive and self-effacing. Other than that little stunt with Charlton Heston, Bowling for Columbine was a funny, insightful, and humane movie. He knows how to step back and let his subjects reveal themselves to the camera, which is why the bit with Heston was kind of disappointing. I have a copy of Moore’s last book sitting on my shelf; I’m hesitant to read it because I’m afraid I’ll find it more polemical than his movies.
The sun hasn’t shown itself in the last two and a half days. I actually like streaks of gray weather like this; it’s good thinking weather I could live in Seatle or London without any problem. In fact, I’d probably get more writing done if I lived somewhere where the climate was in a pissier mode year-round.
Wesley Clark has written a lucid and insightful critique of the Bush Administration’s policies in Iraq, contrasting them with our experiences with the former Soviet Union. It’s worth reading. I’m beginning to lean towards Clark as veep candidate. John Edwards seems a little too eager for the job and there’s nobody else out there who strikes me as a vibrant candidate. And the McCain scenario doesn’t wash with me. He’s a decent enough guy with some moderate views, but emphasis on “some.” He’s still a Republican and I think a lot of people who might vote for Kerry might swing towards Nader or stay home if McCain is Kerry’s pick. And I think that’s exactly what Kerry’s advisors are telling him.
Global warming and climate change are the memes of the moment. First, you have the movie The Day After Tomorrow, where Gaia finally decides it’s had enough and starts bitch-slapping the human race. Then there’s the new novel by Kim Stanley Robinson (whose last book I thought was brilliant) which describes the efforts of scientists to save the world from environmental catastrophe. And NPR recently did a series of reports on varying opinions on global warming. All this attention on climate change probably won’t dissuade anyone from buying that new SUV, but popular culture has always been a good barometer of society’s lingering fears and anxieties. Unfortunately, those anxieties probably won’t be fully realized until it’s too late to do take any remedial action.
The American public school system has always excelled at inculcating a herd mentality in the country’s youth. Students are taught to value conformity in everything from wardrobe choices to musical tastes. But in this post-Columbine, post 9/11 Bizarro world we inhabit, a lot of school administrators are starting to act like petty, anti-intellectual tyrants. Kids are suspended for writing fiction and poetry that some adults label as “dark” or “disturbing.” Teachers are getting laid off after their students read poetry critical of the Bush administration. The Secret Service gets called in when a teacher sees a student’s anti-war drawings. Artistic expression and free speech have become bothersome and inconvenient concepts for many school districts. I’m not worried about the kids; the ones with the creative spark will continue to draw and write and think. But amidst all the propaganda from the White House about exporting freedom, I find it terribly ironic that we allow this kind of behavior in our own institutions of learning.
Someone has designed a tongue-control interface for the Nintendo GameBoy Advance. It’s not the cybernetic X-Box interface I’m waiting for, but we’re getting closer.
My friend Adam nominated for a spot in next year’s Humphrey Institute Policy Fellows program. It sounds like a really exciting opportunity; getting to meet other professionals who are up-and-coming in their respective fields. There may even be a potential trip to Washington D.C., which would be cool because I’ve never been there. One doesn’t grow up dreaming of becoming a policy wonk, but that looks like the direction I’m heading in. And next to writing, I really can’t think of anything I’d rather be doing. Who knows. If Kerry wins in November, maybe I could land some sort of policy advisor position in his Administration.
Tonight, a short entry to compensate for yesterday’s rambling. First, congratulations to the happy couples in Massachusetts who are now able to enjoy the benefits of state-sanctioned marriage. Let”s hope that the religious right doesn’t spoil the party with a constitutional ban or some such foolishness. I could be wrong, but I don’t think this is going to materialize into a wedge issue for Bush. The problem for those who oppose gay marriage is they can’t articulate how it hurts anyone else. Straight people are still going to get married (and divorced) just like before.
Second, Enterprise got renewed? Um, yay, I guess? I was kind of hoping the Star Trek franchise would get a rest and maybe come back with something fresh and original. But because I’m such a tool, I’ll still watch the damn thing, if only to glimpse Jolene Blaylock’s navel once in a while.
I’ve written previously about the Tennessee v. Lane case that was heard before the U.S. Supreme Court last fall. Today, the Court ruled that states can be sued under Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act. This decision came as something of a surprise to many because, in recent years, the Court has adopted a doctrine of limited federal powers based on the Eleventh Amendment. In fact, the Court had already ruled in another case, Garrett, that states cannot be sued under Title I of the ADA (covering employment discrimination). Title II requires publicly funded services and programs to be accessible to people with disabilities and the Court found that the legislation was congruent and proportional to its stated aim of making courts accessible. But that’s what’s puzzling about this ruling; it’s limited to the specific fact pattern of the case. The Court refuses to state whether states would be covered by Title II in cases involving other services or programs. I’m not sure why the majority took this approach. It seems counter-productive to leave the door open to future litigation with the somewhat absurd result of courts having to parse out the scope of a state’s responsibilities under Title II. Perhaps the Justices didn’t want to give the impression that they were making a dramatic break with previous Eleventh Amendment holdings.
And I have to point out something Scalia said in his concurring dissent:
Requiring access for disabled persons to all public buildings cannot remotely be considered a means of �enforcing� the Fourteenth Amendment. The considerations of long accepted practice and of policy that sanctioned such distortion of language where state racial discrimination is at issue do not apply in this field of social policy far removed from the principal object of the Civil War Amendments.
It’s this kind of strict textualism that drives me up the wall. How is eliminating institutional discrimination any different than eliminating institutional racial discrimination? No, the drafters of the 14th Amendment probably had no concept of disability rights, but they did have the wisdom to not restrict the Amendment purely to matters of race. The Fourteenth Amendment sprang out of the horrors of slavery, but it was crafted to ensure equal protection to everyone with no exceptions or qualifiers. Scalia rigid interpretation is without intellectual merit and, frankly, it’s un-American
Why is it that all movies set in ancient historical times have their characters speak in British accents? Do we somehow associate that style of speech with grander, more epic eras? I was sitting in the movie theater yesterday, watching Brad Pitt trying to act all classical and heroic, and I suddenly wondered what Achilles would sound like with a deep Southern drawl or a thick Scottish brogue. Yes, my attention wandered during the film. It wasn’t a bad movie, but after the second or third mano a mano fight scene, I got kind of bored.
I also rented this made-for-cable movie titled Door to Door. William H. Macy plays a door-to-door salesman with cerebral palsy who got his job in the mid Fifties, when it was extremely rare for anyone with a disability to be employed. Macy nails the mannerisms and speech of someone with CP. As for the story itself, eh. I guess it’s based on a real person and I admired his drive to live and work independently, but I didn’t necessarily like him. Maybe it was the whole salesman schtick. The thought of selling laundry detergent and dog biscuits for decade after decade fills me with a peculiar kind of horror. But I can understand his desire to stick with a job that had some degree of security for him. The movie also painted him as a kind of social idiot, pushing away any real close friendships and even, apparently, a romantic opportunity. Maybe I just got a little sensitive because sometimes I worry about going through the rest of my life essentially alone.
Some of you know my fondness for tornado porn. Here’s a cool video clip showing a twister going medieval on some poor house.
