Apr 042011
 

Tomorrow House Republicans will unveil their plan for reducing the federal deficit. It’s the brainchild of the GOP policy wunderkind Paul Ryan, who hails from my home state of Wisconsin. If this is the best wonk, the nation is well and truly fucked. I use that epithet because that’s exactly what this plan would do to the elderly, poor, and people with disabilities. It savages Medicare and Medicaid by cutting trillions of dollars from both programs while making the Orwellian claim that these cuts will promote “reform.” I’ll look at the Medicare cuts tomorrow, but let’s take a look at how Medicaid would fare.

Right now, Medicaid is an “entitlement” program, which means that anyone who is eligible for the program is entitled to its benefits. Medicaid rolls increased exponentially during the recession because more people became eligible as they lost their jobs and their income. Ryan’s plan would transform Medicaid into a block grant, which means that states would get a fixed amount of money to spend on their Medicaid programs. Once the yearly allotment is used up, that’s it. What happens if another recession hits and the allotment isn’t sufficient to provide services to everyone who is eligible? Too bad.

But it gets even better. States would have wide latitude to set eligibility criteria and determine what services to offer. Since states have to stay within their allotted grant caps, they will have every incentive to restrict eligibility as much as possible. Many working poor families who rely on Medicaid because they can’t afford private insurance might find themselves without health coverage because their incomes would be too high under “reformed” Medicaid. Medicaid buy-in programs like the one I use to purchase Medicaid so that I can keep working could disappear because “reformed” Medicaid can’t afford to support employed people with disabilities. On the services side, the same dynamic exists. States may decide to cut services to the bare essentials, leaving many people without access to therapies and treatments that keep them out of the emergency room. Nursing homes would probably survive because they are a politically powerful lobby (nobody wants to imagine Grandma out on the street), but at the cost of home and community-based services that keep people with disabilities and the elderly out of such facilities. Much of the progress made over the last few decades in integrating people with disabilities into the community would be lost.

Medicaid serves an inherently vulnerable and politically disenfranchised population: the poor, people with disabilities, and the elderly. “Reformed” Medicaid would make this population only more vulnerable to the whims of legislators who might not be terribly sympathetic to their plight. Of course, that’s exactly what Ryan and his colleagues intend.

Tomorrow, we’ll look at the proposed cuts to Medicare.

Apr 012011
 

I was going to write something about how I have to cut this post short because a trio of beautiful women in fishnets and very little else are waiting for me in the other room, but my readers are much too clever for easy April Fool’s jokes and as such they’re beneath both you and me. If you want such chicanery, Google has you covered.

Besides, my, um, friends aren’t scheduled to show up until next weekend.

Mar 312011
 

Governor Dayton visited the Department of Human Services today to thank employees for their efforts on expanding Medicaid to ten of thousands of low-income Minnesotans. It’s a little sad that such expressions of gratitude to state workers have become a rare thing these days. A lot of my colleagues put in some long hours on this project without any expectation of recognition, so this was a pleasant reward.

And here’s me accepting on behalf of my division a certificate of recognition for our efforts.

Mar 302011
 

My home broadband connection is on the speedier end of what’s available to the average American consumer. It averages about 15-20 Mbps, which is plenty fast for my needs. But this time next year, it’s going to look like dial-up compared to the blazing fast speeds that will be available to the good people of Kansas City, Kansas. That’s because Google has selected Kansas City as the test location for a 1Gbps fiber network that may be a precursor to similar networks in other cities. If Google can offer these connections to ordinary people at rates that match or beat those of cable and DSL providers, it could be the beginning of a new era of competition and innovation in a market that is now under the grip of a lethargic duopoly.

Google’s selection of a mid-sized city in the Plains is also shrewd strategic planning for future networks. Lots of communities are casting about for economic drivers to replace their shrinking manufacturing base. If Kansas City reaps economic rewards attributable to the presence of this network, other cities will take notice and welcome Google and its partners with open arms.

Mar 292011
 

As a devoted Firefox user, I’m ethically obliged to point out that the final version of Firefox 4 is now available for download. I’ve previously shared my positive impressions of the beta and I’m no less impressed with the final release. It’s a sleek, modern browser that is snappy and highly customizable. If you’re still using Firefox 3.6 (or *cringe* Internet Explorer), you owe it to yourself to upgrade.

Mar 282011
 

Slate continues to cover the bursting of the law school bubble; this time pointing out that law school applications are down 11.5% from this time last year. The job market for new attorneys has improved somewhat in recent months, but not nearly enough to accommodate the glut of law school graduates that enter the workforce every year. Perhaps this decline in applications will portend a shuttering of some of the more marginal law schools, which would only benefit the legal profession as a whole.

Some might might argue that cheering for the closing of lower-tier schools smacks of elitism. Maybe so, but just as not everyone can or should be a physician, not everyone can or should be an attorney. The proliferation of law schools may have thrown open the doors of graduate education to more people, but that wasn’t in the service of the public interest or even the students’ interest. Times are changing and a legal education is not the guarantor of affluence and stability that it once was; a fact with which law schools are only beginning to grapple. And I say this as someone who recognizes that even veteran attorneys face tenuous career prospects. If state government downsizes, I could find myself competing with the aforementioned glut of new grads.

Mar 252011
 

When I finally get my brain-computer interface installed in my melon, I’d like some assurances that they won’t have to crack my skull open six months later to replace the batteries. I may not have to worry too much since a recent study shows that these microprocessors have an operational life of at least 1,000 days after implantation. By the time I get mine, it will probably last until the alien invaders upload me into my cyborg body, which is good enough for me.

Mar 242011
 

Minnesota Republicans released their proposed cuts to health and human services this week. There’s much to not like in these bills, but one of the most damaging proposals is what my colleagues and I refer to as the “global waiver”. Minnesota would be required to seek a federal waiver that would allow the state to administer its Medicaid program as it wishes and without regard to pesky federal regulations. Specifically, lawmakers want to be free to increase cost-sharing, restrict services based on population or geographic region, establish stricter income and asset limits, and require individuals to purchase private health insurance. It would transform Minnesota’s Medicaid program into something much more limited in reach and scope.

Republicans attribute significant savings to this waiver, but that’s problematic. The waiver proposal is written so vaguely that it’s difficult for state officials to determine exactly how it would change the program and thus how much savings it would generate. Furthermore, the federal government is unlikely to approve such a waiver (even if the governor signs off on it, which is also doubtful). It’s budget balancing through wishful thinking. But wishful thinking is more palatable than cutting funds to nursing homes or services for people with disabilities, which is what Republicans may have to do if they are truly committed to balancing the budget without raising taxes.

Mar 232011
 

I was going to blog about health care policy shenanigans at the Capitol, but I just spent the last few hours in a meeting and then typing notes from the meeting. The stupid is starting to settle in my mind and make itself a sandwich, so my cogent observations will have to wait until tomorrow.

Mar 222011
 

I just realized I have a little more than two months to squeeze in the rest of my CLE credits for the year. I always put this off until the last minute and usually have to request an extension. Bad attorney.