Oct 202009
 

One of my current work assignments is to review the latest version of the Senate Finance Committee health care bill. The original Chairman’s Mark was written in plain language and weighed in at approximately 200 pages. The new version is over 1,500 pages. The substance hasn’t changed, but the new version of the bill is written in High Legalese. And as Ezra Klein points out, it’s this style of writing that makes legislation so long and difficult to read. Terms have to be defined, different sections of the bill have to cross-reference each other, subsections have to have sub-subsections, and so on and so forth. A sentence’s worth of prose is probably equivalent to a paragraph’s worth of legislative language. Good legislative language can and should be readable, but by its nature it’s long-winded and dry.

And a special plea to Congressional staffers: I really appreciate the fact that you release bills as PDFs, but you might want to consider adding bookmarks to help us navigate through these epic documents. Scrolling through a 1,500 page bill to find a particular section is an exercise in mind-numbing tedium.

Oct 192009
 

I like to think of life in narrative terms: it has a beginning, middle, and end. But let’s take the analogy a little further. What if your life was measured according to the length of a popular movie? How far along would you be in the movie? Using Star Wars as my yardstick (natch) and assuming an average lifespan, I’m almost halfway through the movie. The Death Star is about to blast Alderaan into tiny pieces. But if I assume a shorter lifespan (let’s say sixty years, which still seems generous), then I’m at the part where Han, Luke, and Chewie are about to rescue Princess Leia.

It’s an interesting way of putting mortality into perspective. I take some consolation in the fact that I haven’t missed the Rebels’ assault on the Death Star. That part rules. 

Oct 182009
 

Maurice Sendak’s Where the Wild Things Are, the book upon which the film is based, never featured prominently in my childhood, so I had only a passing familiarity with the story of Max and his journey to the island of monsters. While the source material is a children’s book, I’m not sure this is the kind of film that kids will play over and over on the DVD player in the den. Max’s imagination is a chaotic, melancholy, reckless place that is ruled by the peculiar logic of children. The monsters are not cuddly and fanciful Pixar creations; they are mangy and vaguely threatening. And Max’s adventures on the island are not carefree and whimsical. Feelings get hurt, often unintentionally. Grand plans go awry. Sadness and loneliness find their way in.

The film’s artistry is undeniable, but it didn’t connect with me. The plot is necessarily flimsy and the characters are necessarily flat, but I found myself getting impatient with the movie. I kept waiting for some sort of narrative to take shape, but I think that’s missing the point. The story isn’t about a series of events. It’s about one lonely and imaginative boy’s state of mind.

Oct 172009
 

I cut my landline a few months ago in favor of a shiny new iPhone. I still love my phone (nothing passes the time on a three-hour flight better than being able to watch a bunch of Firefly episodes), but I’m becoming familiar with the annoyances that come from having only a cell phone. One is rather trivial: remembering to silence the ringer before going into a meeting. I’ve been in at least one big staff meeting where I’ve forgotten to do that and everyone was treated to my undeniably dorky sci-fi ringtone.

The other annoyance is more serious. In the last week or so, people have tried calling me only to be kicked into voicemail. This is particularly irksome because I live in a secure building that requires people to call me to get buzzed in. I updated the phone’s operating system and things seem to be functioning normally now, but our cellular infrastructure still has a long way to go before it can match the reliability of good old copper wiring.

Oct 162009
 

You need to go read my friend Allie’s latest post on health care reform, television news, and her crush on Brian Williams. She basically punches mainstream media in the gut for its woeful coverage of the health care debate and then instructs it to get cleaned up and put some clothes on. I’m thinking of taking Allie as my padawan. I will instruct her in the ways of the Wonk. In due time, she will grow more powerful than me until she has a nationally syndicated column and a tenured position at a major university. And then she will strike me down by shooting lightning bolts out of her fingertips. After all, there can be only one.

Oct 152009
 

I’ve said before that health care reform is of vital importance to the disability community. To further illustrate my point, I offer the case of Ian Pearl. Pearl has spinal muscular atrophy, uses a ventilator, and received private duty nursing under his father’s small group insurance plan. Guardian, the insurer, cancelled insurance policies across the entire state to stop paying for high-cost beneficiaries like Pearl. One Guardian executive revealed the company’s naked greed when he referred to these beneficiaries as “dogs” in an internal e-mail.

Pearl lives in Florida, which doesn’t provide nursing care as part of its Medicaid program. His family is wealthy enough to continue funding his care for a few years, but that money will eventually run out. Pearl may eventually be faced with the untenable choice of entering an institution or moving to another state that does provide nursing care.

The bills under consideration wouldn’t force insurers to offer nursing care as a benefit, but it could prevent this kind of large-scale rescission as a cost-cutting measure. And at some point, the feds really need to look at creating a uniform package of home care services for people with severe disabilities that is largely or completely federally funded.

Oct 142009
 

James Ellroy, the crime writer noted for his L.A. Quartet of books and his American Underworld Trilogy, made an an appearance at the Fitzgerald Theater last week as part of Minnesota Public Radio’s Talking Volumes series. I discovered Ellroy a few years ago and the first two volumes of his Underworld series blew me away, so I decided to get tickets for the event. Ellroy has a huge ego–he likes to refer to himself as the greatest American crime writer in history–and it was on full display during the on-stage interview. His description of his writing process was the most interesting part of the discussion. For his latest novel, he wrote a four-hundred page outline before even beginning to write the actual narrative. I find the thought of writing a page a day an overwhelming concept, which probably explains why he’s a wildly successful author and I’m not.

He was kind enough to sign a copy of Blood’s A Rover for me and I’ll review it here at some point, although first I have to finish Gaiman’s American Gods for book club.

Oct 132009
 

I realized today that I need to make an appointment for a seating adjusted. Over the last several months, I’ve noticed that I’m slouching to one side even more than usual and that the sweet spot of total comfort has become more elusive. The last straw came today when I was compelled to stick an empty bottle behind my back cushion in order to give me a bit of extra support. I have a bad habit of ignoring minor discomforts until I finally get annoyed enough to jury-rig a half-assed solution and wait for an appointment with a professional. Fortunately, I’ll only have to wait a couple weeks this time.

My seating system is over fifteen years old and has already been through a couple revisions, which makes me wonder how much more can be done with this old thing. It’s served me well, but I no longer have the body of a man in his early twenties. Well, relatively speaking, anyway.

Oct 122009
 

If you’ve already started your holiday shopping (and really, who hasn’t?) in the hopes of finding me the perfect gift, might I direct you to the pages of the Neiman Marcus Christmas catalog?  I’ve got my eye on the dinner at the Algonquin Hotel with literary and political luminaries like Malcolm Gladwell, Nora Ephron, Henry Louis Gates, Jr., and George Stephanopoulous. The cost is two hundred grand, so you might want to pool your money with all my Facebook friends. I’ll hold an essay contest to decide who will be my dinner companion. The topic will be “The Ninety-Nine Ways in which Mark Is Totally Awesome”. Extra credit if you can make it an even hundred. Afterwards, I’ll post pictures to the blog of John Lithgow drunkenly re-enacting scenes from Ricochet and of me and Stephanopoulous arm-wrestling after dessert.

C’mon, it’s either this or a book that I probably won’t get to for at least two or three years.

Oct 112009
 

We may finally have a proposal on the table that could provide a resolution to the war of attrition on the public option. Under the proposal brought forth by Delaware senator Tom Carper, states would have the ability to opt out of the national public option if they did not with to participate. From a policy perspective, it’s an imperfect but workable solution. Perhaps two-thirds of states would likely enroll in the public option immediately, giving the government a substantial customer base and corresponding bargaining power with health care providers. The downside is that some people–especially those in poorer Southern states–might not have the public option available for at least the first year or two after it goes into effect in other states.

I don’t like the idea of excluding some people from a public option simply because they have the misfortune of living in a state full of Glenn Beck acolytes and conspiracy theorists, but these states might be prodded to adopt the public option once they see that it’s working in other states (without an accompanying boom in communes and without any seizures of private property). Given the toxic politics surrounding this issue, this compromise might be the best way to ensure passage of a strong public option while simultaneously giving conservative the opportunity to realize the real-life consequences of their nihilistic public policy.