Nov 252009
 

I posted a couple days ago about Rom Houben, the Belgian man who was misdiagnosed as being in a coma for the last couple decades. Since then, the story has taken another interesting turn. Hauben described his experience to German magazine Der Spiegel using a method called “facilitated communication”, a method by which an assistant holds the individual’s hand and helps the individual type out messages on a keyboard. His recounting is quite vivid:

I became the witness to my own suffering, as doctors and nurses tried to speak to me and eventually gave up.

Facilitated communication is viewed with skepticism by many because it’s difficult to determine whether the assistant is simply assisting or actually typing out the messages for the individual. Most controlled studies have found facilitated communication to be unreliable and subject to the assistant conscious or unconscious influence. That isn’t to say that Houben isn’t self-aware. But it seems reasonable to wonder how articulate any of us would be after having no social interaction for the better part of a lifetime.

Nov 242009
 

I was just looking at the GOP’s recently issued draft statement of “principles” for aspiring conservative candidates. #9 caught my attention:

(9) Protecting the lives of vulnerable persons by opposing health care rationing and denial of health care and government funding of abortion;

You gotta love the epic irony of Republicans using the health care debate to position themselves as defenders of the meek and helpless. It’s fine to advocate against health care reform, but I’m increasingly disturbed by conservatives’ attempts to equate opposition to health care reform as some kind of noble act of compassion. Somebody needs to explain to me how expanding Medicaid to more children and adults in poverty is not “protecting the lives of vulnerable persons”.

Actually, I’m not sure I want an explanation since odds are good that it would give me a migraine.

Nov 232009
 

A lot of what we know about the brain is still wrong. We’re discovering more every day about the inner workings of mind and consciousness, but that’s of little consolation to someone like Rom Houben. After being seriously injured in a car accident twenty-three years ago, Houben’s doctors misdiagnosed him as being in a coma even though he continued to be completely self-aware. The misdiagnosis came to light only after a neurologist conducted a comprehensive reassessment that revealed his brain ccontinued to function normally.

I can’t even imagine the frustration and despair that this man must have felt as the years marched on. I can’t imagine all the times he must have been in discomfort or pain and unable to communicate the fact to anyone. I’d be very interested to know what coping mechanisms he developed to deal with such long-term isolation. Once neural implants are perfected, Houben should be first in line to receive one.

Nov 222009
 

Once it became clear that the Democrats had sixty votes, last night’s procedural vote on health care was somewhat anticlimactic, although no less significant. Every procedural hurdle surmounted adds to the growing perception that the bill’s passage is inevitable. The Senate leadership still has its work cut out for it, though. Senators Lieberman, Landrieu, Nelson, and Lincoln (I have no doubt the media will start referring to them as the Gang of Four, if they haven’t already) are going be the most popular kids in school for the next few weeks because they remain the wild cards in a final vote. If a public option disappears from the final, it will because one or more of these Democrats demanded it as a pound of flesh for their vote.

I can live with a bill that doesn’t include a public option, but I truly don’t understand these senators’ ferocious opposition to the concept. It polls well and the Congressional Budget Office has already determined it will save money. Three of these senators come from conservative states and they may feel the need to appease the Glen Beck crowd, but that doesn’t explain Lieberman, who is doing his best to end a long career in public service with a reputation as a resentful narcissist.

Progressives are going to have to do a lot of flattering, persuading, and cajoling in the coming weeks to ensure that the Senate passes a bill full of tepid and half-hearted reforms.

Nov 212009
 

Some of you know that I’m a Buffy the Vampire Slayer fan. It’s one of the better-scripted series to have appeared on television with plenty of wit, depth, and cute women talking smack and kicking ass. It deserves a lot of credit for kicking off the modern pop culture fascination with all things vampire. Which brings me to the Twilight series. Now, I haven’t read any of the books or seen any of the movies, but from all the reviews I’ve read of Meyers’ oeuvre, it seems like pretty weak tea compared to the Buffy series. A bunch of mopey vampires and a heroine who doesn’t really do anything heroic making googly eyes at each other.

A brilliant mashup of the Buffy and Twilight franchises lays bare the stark differences in how these two fictional universes regard women. Take a guess as to which one takes a more patriarchal view and seems to imply that stalking is perfectly acceptable behavior for hysterically emo guys. And don’t even get me started on a comparison of the dialog. Ick. Just…ick.

Nov 202009
 

I’ve explained to a couple people that tomorrow’s Senate vote on health care is not a vote on the actual bill. Rather, it’s a vote to begin floor debate. Senators will be grandstanding in front of the C-SPAN cameras as they debate whether they should continue debating. It’s yet another illustration of how our political system is biased towards preserving the status quo. The Senate rulebook may be one of the most important documents governing our legislative process, but its not something that merits much discussion in high school civics classes. That’s a shame because people deserve to understand that political gridlock is a function of process as much as it is a function of personalities.

Nov 192009
 

According to Intel researchers, I may only have to wait another decade for the brain implant that will give me control of my computer and, before long, much of the civilized world. In 2020, I won’t even be fifty years old yet, still young enough to lead a revolution. I just have to keep my mind sharp until then to ensure I have the necessary mental fortitude necessary to bend the Internet to my will. Time to start my daily regimen of crossword puzzles.

I should also commission someone to mock up my propaganda art. I’m envisioning giant murals of just my face with a third eye in the middle of my forehead. Or is that too over-the-top?

Nov 182009
 

I’m off shortly to hear Stephen King and Audrey Neffineger give a talk at the Fitzgerald. I’m bummed that I don’t have my old unabridged copy of The Stand for King to sign, but I’ll bring my copy of Under the Dome. It’s a ginormous book and could probably cause serious physical harm if placed in the wrong hands. But Kindle versions don’t really lend themselves to being signed.

Nov 172009
 

Even though I’m on a vent, my lungs do a pretty good job of keeping themselves clear. It might take me a little longer to cough something up, but I eventually get the job done. On rare occasions, I sometimes need a little assistance in the form of some rigorous chest percussions. It’s a crude but effective method. However, subtler means of maintaining good pulmonary health are now becoming available. The Lung Flute is one of those simple yet ingenious devices that, in retrospect, seem obvious. When an individual blows into the Lung Flute, it creates sympathetic vibrations in the chest cavity that vibrate the hair-like cilia in the lungs. The cilia are responsible for sweeping mucus up to the throat, where it can then be swallowed or spat out.

I’ll probably stick with the occasional chest beating, if for no other reason than to satisfy my masochistic urges. But for people with cystic fibrosis or other pulmonary conditions, the Wand could be quite useful.

Nov 162009
 

The blogosphere got a case of the vapors yesterday when longtime blogger Belle de Jour voluntarily relinquished her anonymity and revealed herself to be both pretty and geeky,complete with a Ph.D. in informatics, epidemiology, and forensic science. Belle (a.k.a Brooke Magnanti) was one of the first bloggers to achieve celebrity status based purely on the content of her blog postings (in Belle’s case, she blogged about her experiences as a London escort). She parlayed her blog’s popularity into book and television deals, thus earning the envy and ire of all us amateurs pecking away at our keyboards as visions of literary contracts danced before our eyes.

Some might argue that Magnanti, with her middle-class background and advanced education, isn’t typical of the women who earn a living as sex workers. They may be right. It’s even possible that she’s perpetuating a long con on a public who subconsciously wants to accept commercial sex as long as it’s nonthreateningly packaged as an attractive and seemingly well-adjusted woman with an English accent and a completed dissertation. But she might just be someone who blogged about an interesting and unusual time in her life and now wants to reclaim her identity. I hope it works out for her.