Jul 022006
 

Encarna Conde, a Spanish woman with a disability, wrote a porn producer to complain about the lack of actors with disabilities in his productions.  According to this Guardian article, the producer invited her to appear in a film entitled “Breaking Barriers”.  The article is rather vague about the details of her appearance, although I don’t get the impression that Ms. Conde actually performed.  As others have noted, the press doesn’t seem too interested in using this story as a springboard for a deeper exploration of issues surrounding disability and sexuality.  Instead, it’s merely back-page fluff, a convenient excuse for putting the words “wheelchair” and “porn” in a single headline that might induce the reader’s eyes to linger on the page to notice the ad for Tesco’s below the fold.
 
Thanks to Wheelchair Dancer for pointing me to this story.  This is the first time I’ve visited her blog, but the quality of the writing is good enough to warrant regular reading. 

Jul 012006
 

July’s my vacation month.  I’m at the start of a five-day weekend and I’ll have another week off near the end of the month.  I haven’t really had much time off since my trip to Europe last year and I feel like I’m due for a breather.  Financial considerations prevent me from taking any trips this time around, but I’m sure I can have myself a nice little urban holiday right here at home.  I’m hitting Superman Returns tonight with a couple friends and I’m going to try to enjoy the generally spectacular weather that is supposed to grace these parts for the next few days.  While there are a few errands requiring my attention, there will be much walking, reading, late-night movie-watching, and general loafing in the coming weeks. 

Jun 302006
 

I subscribe to the Sunday New York Times, but I’ve never paid much attention to the crossword puzzle.  I didn’t grow up doing puzzles, partly because they strictly existed in pen-and-paper format and weren’t accessible to me without someone else’s assistance.  But after seeing Wordplay with a friend last night, I’m considering shelling out a few bucks for a subscription to the electronic NYT Crossword Section.  I have no delusions about being able to complete the Sunday puzzle, but I’m fairly confident that I could do a Monday or Tuesday puzzle without embarrassing myself.  And perhaps by perfecting my crossword skills, I will win favor with my lord and liege, Jon Stewart, a renowned puzzle freak. 
 
And speaking of the Times, here’s an op-ed piece from today’s edition by my friend Erik Lundegaard in which he responds to a somewhat trivial criticism of the new Superman film from the political right.   

Jun 292006
 

The only branch of federal government that seems capable of making reasoned, adult decisions as of late is the Supreme Court.  Today’s decision quashing the Administration’s efforts to hold special military tribunals for Gitmo detainees will be regarded as a landmark ruling for decades to come.  The Court’s opinion reaffirms that the President does not, even in the midst of this war without end, have the power to act as judge and jury.  I’d like to hope that this decision marks a watershed moment; the beginning of the end to this President’s arrogant power grab. 

Jun 282006
 

In preparation for Bryan Singer’s Superman film, I re-watched the 1978 version starring Christopher Reeve.  I  remember enjoying this film as a kid and I thought it might be interesting to see how it held up.  Yeesh.  The first half hour is okay, mostly because we get to watch Jor-El and General Zod glower at each other, but afterwards the movie descends quickly into uninspired camp.  Lex Luthor in a wig?  And what is up with that god-awful inner monologue (“Can you read my mind?”) delivered by Margot Kidder?  Her character is supposed to be a crackerjack reporter and she’s reciting dialog that sounds like it was written by a teenage girl with a crush on the guy who sits in front of her in geometry class.  Oh, and I’m pretty sure time doesn’t run backwards simply because Superman reverses the Earth’s orbit. 
 
I want those two hours of my life back. 

Jun 272006
 

Net neutrality, once an issue that was discussed primarily on tech sites like Slashdot or Ars Technica, is now receiving coverage in more mainstream news outlets.  For the uninitiated, the debate surrounding net neutrality (or “network neutrality”) centers on the following question: should the major telecom companies (Comcast, AT&T, etc.) be able to charge Internet companies like Google and Amazon a premium for access to their high-speed networks.  Advocates of net neutrality believe that government regulation is necessary to prevent the telcos from restricting access to content that isn’t on their “preferred” list.  They argue that a provider like Comcast could restrict customers’ access to a streaming video site that didn’t pay a “Preferred Access” fee to Comcast.
 
Opponents of net neutrality do not want to see any government regulation.  They argue that the telcos should be able to recoup the billion-dollar investments they made to increase the network’s capacity and that they should be able to charge bandwidth hogs like Yahoo to fund any future network upgrades. 
 
Both sides have been engaging in massive amounts of spin to win favor in the court of public opinion, which only serves to confuse the issue further.  Opponents of net neutrality neglect to mention that major internet companies already pay big bandwidth fees to the telcos.  And advocates of regulation probably overstate the likelihood that the telcos will restrict access to content and risk a consumer backlash.  On the whole, however, I’m in favor of at least some minimal regulation to ensure that all content is equally available to the public, regardless of the content’s source or the ownership of the network pipes carrying that content.  While I don’t think the Internet is likely to become a proprietary network, most telcos are quasi-monopolies in their respective geographic regions, which requires society to exercise a higher degree of vigilance in this sector of the marketplace. 

Jun 262006
 

I took a trip in the Wayback Machine when I watched this clip of Stevie Wonder laying down the funk on Sesame Street with an extended rendition of “Superstition”.  I’m pretty sure I remember seeing this performance when I was a mere tyke.  Actually, I owe Sesame Street a sizable debt for setting me on a road to academic achievement and professional success.  My parents and Sesame Street were probably the two biggest influences on my budding intellect.  Ernie was the character I wanted to hang out with the most, while Cookie Monster struck me as something of a simpleton.  As I got older, I became a devotee of The Electric Company (“Hey, you guyyyys!”) and 3-2-1 Contact, thus ensuring that I would be a lifelong acolyte of the Public Broadcasting Service. 

Jun 252006
 

The new Guthrie opens today and I think I’m going to venture over to the open house later.  I’ve heard some mixed reviews of the new theater’s accessibility and I hope to check it out myself.  Downtown Minneapolis is experiencing something of a mini-Renaissance, with the new Guthrie, the new Central Library, and the new addition to the Minneapolis Art Institute.  I was telling someone the other day that when I was a kid, I dreamed of living in a tall building in the downtown of a big city where I could walk to all kinds of fun and interesting things.  Looks like I got my wish. 

Jun 242006
 

Since May, we’ve had a legal intern at work to help us with some tasks related to the implementation of the Demonstration.  He’s a smart guy and eager to help, but I often have to remind myself to ask for his assistance.  Most state employees don’t have much in the way of administrative support, which means I usually end up doing my own copying and mailing, not to mention my own proofreading and research.  It’s great to have the help, but it requires a slight shift in my work habits. 
 
I’m also reminded that my first legal internship was ten years ago this summer.  I worked at the Minnesota Disability Law Center and I remember being in a constant state of mild unease because I was never completely sure I knew what I was doing.  Most people don’t understand this, but the core law school curriculum doesn’t teach you much about the practical aspects of working in a legal setting.  Law school teaches you to think like an attorney, but you’re on your own when it comes to figuring out how to do day-to-day tasks like writing a letter to a client or drafting a policy white paper. 

Jun 232006
 

It’s Friday.  I’m lazy.  Accordingly, I turn to the unambitious blogger’s favorite crutch, the list:
 
Five Things I Find Appealing in Members of the Opposite Sex
 
  1. Assertiveness–I’m a big fan of women who are confident and unequivocal in both thought and action.  That’s probably why I’m a sucker for pop culture content that features strong female characters. 
  2. Intellect–No big surprise for those of you who know me.  Smart, bright women get me all hot and bothered. 
  3. Wit–Preferably the dry, obscure kind
  4. Butt–No, I’m not trying to be crude.  However, when you go through the world in a sitting position, certain things are always at eye level and you develop affinities.  
  5. Style–This isn’t about clothes.  It’s about having a certain grace and presence that I have difficulty articulating, but I know it when I see it.